{"id":24,"date":"2017-11-28T19:54:49","date_gmt":"2017-11-28T19:54:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/chapter\/peer-review-offer-perspectives-not-directives\/"},"modified":"2018-07-24T17:04:57","modified_gmt":"2018-07-24T17:04:57","slug":"peer-review-offer-perspectives-not-directives","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/chapter\/peer-review-offer-perspectives-not-directives\/","title":{"rendered":"3.6 Peer Review and Responding to Others\u2019 Drafts"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"how-to:-be-a-constructive-peer-reviewer\">\r\n\r\nStudents tend to have a love or hate relationship to peer review. Some have had wonderful, helpful, rich histories with classmates offering feedback on their work; others have the perspective that peer review is pointless.\r\n\r\nWhen it works, both giving and receiving peer feedback can be a great learning opportunity. If you look at other people's work in progress, you undoubtedly get some ideas about how you could do something different or better in your own draft. But even if you are looking at a draft that is weaker than yours, you may learn a lot: about what writing looks like when it is <em>not<\/em> working, perhaps <em>why<\/em> it is not working, or even what specific choices or revisions that writer could make to strengthen the draft. Identifying what makes things work -\u00a0 so important in the learning process - can be hard to detect in our own work.\r\n<h2>Remember that in peer review, you don't need to cast judgment on a classmate's work.<\/h2>\r\nYou don't need to take on the role of a \"grader\" or offer suggestions to fix the paper. You don't need to correct things. Sometimes, what is more valuable is if you share your experience as a reader of the draft, explaining what felt easy and clear to you, and also where you struggled to understand what the writer was trying to accomplish.\u00a0Be honest, accurate, detailed, and descriptive. Write in such a way that you offer your genuine readerly perspective to your partner, not a list of directions or directives.\r\n<h2>Rhetorical Reading Questions for Peer Feedback<\/h2>\r\nThe use of rhetorical reading questions can offer feedback on the effectiveness of the text-in-progress. Ask yourself the following while reading your own or a peer's draft:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What is the writer's main point?<\/strong> Can you see what your partner's main point is in this draft? Is the point held consistently throughout the text, or did you get lost while reading at any point? If so, can you point out where reference to or reiteration of to the main point would have helped your reading experience?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"font-size: 14pt\">What information does the writer provide to support the central idea?<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt\"> Did you need more information to feel like the central idea was well supported? Do all paragraphs relate to the text\u2019s central idea?<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What kind of evidence does the writer use? <\/strong>Is it based more on fact or opinion? Can you clearly identify where this evidence come from? Are the sources authoritative and credible?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Is the writer working towards achieving the assignment's purpose?<\/strong>\u00a0This is a question that is easiest to answer<i> <\/i>if you fully understand the assignment's purpose. What are the goals of the assignment? What are the goals of this particular writer? Do those goals overlap?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Describe the tone in the draft.<\/strong> Is it friendly? Authoritative? Does it lecture? Is it biting or sarcastic? Does the author use simple language, or is it full of jargon? Does the language feel positive or negative? Now, consider the audience for this essay. Does the tone seem appropriate for that audience?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2>Using \"I\" statements to offer feedback on others' work<\/h2>\r\n<strong>Offer observations of assignment goals met\/not met<\/strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>I see your thesis at the end of your intro paragraph<\/li>\r\n \t<li>I see transition phrases at the beginning of each new paragraph<\/li>\r\n \t<li>I can see that you ___________, \u00a0which is a goal of this paper<\/li>\r\n \t<li>In your ________ paragraph I see....but I do not see....<\/li>\r\n \t<li>I do not see a Works Cited<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<strong>Express your experience as a reader<\/strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>My understanding is that the thesis of this paper should _______. I did not clearly see ______ in your thesis. Instead, I see (explain).<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>I was confused by this sentence (share the sentence) and I took it to mean (explain how you read that sentence).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>In paragraph ______ I thought that, based on what you said in the first sentence, the whole paragraph would discuss X. But it looks to me like at the end of the paragraph, you begin discussing Y, which felt to me like a new and different idea.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<strong>Express places where, as a reader, you were drawn in to the writing<\/strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>I thought that the second paragraph was really clear and interesting because....<\/li>\r\n \t<li>I like the way that you structured paragraph X because ....<\/li>\r\n \t<li>I appreciate your use of (signal phrases? citations? MLA format? transitions? etc) because I have been struggling with that in my own writing. Thanks for the example<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<h2>Phrases that can be ineffective<\/h2>\r\nThese types of phrases are telling the writer what to do and\/or simply offering judgment. They are \"you\" statements, not \"I\" statements.\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><strong>Try to avoid these types of peer assessment phrases:<\/strong><\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> should fix<\/del><\/li>\r\n \t<li>The assignment says to ____<del>_ but <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">you<\/span> didn't do that<\/del><\/li>\r\n \t<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> need more____<\/del><\/li>\r\n \t<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> need less_____<\/del><\/li>\r\n \t<li>To <del>make the paper better, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">you<\/span> need to____<\/del><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"how-to:-be-a-constructive-peer-reviewer\">\n<p>Students tend to have a love or hate relationship to peer review. Some have had wonderful, helpful, rich histories with classmates offering feedback on their work; others have the perspective that peer review is pointless.<\/p>\n<p>When it works, both giving and receiving peer feedback can be a great learning opportunity. If you look at other people&#8217;s work in progress, you undoubtedly get some ideas about how you could do something different or better in your own draft. But even if you are looking at a draft that is weaker than yours, you may learn a lot: about what writing looks like when it is <em>not<\/em> working, perhaps <em>why<\/em> it is not working, or even what specific choices or revisions that writer could make to strengthen the draft. Identifying what makes things work &#8211;\u00a0 so important in the learning process &#8211; can be hard to detect in our own work.<\/p>\n<h2>Remember that in peer review, you don&#8217;t need to cast judgment on a classmate&#8217;s work.<\/h2>\n<p>You don&#8217;t need to take on the role of a &#8220;grader&#8221; or offer suggestions to fix the paper. You don&#8217;t need to correct things. Sometimes, what is more valuable is if you share your experience as a reader of the draft, explaining what felt easy and clear to you, and also where you struggled to understand what the writer was trying to accomplish.\u00a0Be honest, accurate, detailed, and descriptive. Write in such a way that you offer your genuine readerly perspective to your partner, not a list of directions or directives.<\/p>\n<h2>Rhetorical Reading Questions for Peer Feedback<\/h2>\n<p>The use of rhetorical reading questions can offer feedback on the effectiveness of the text-in-progress. Ask yourself the following while reading your own or a peer&#8217;s draft:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What is the writer&#8217;s main point?<\/strong> Can you see what your partner&#8217;s main point is in this draft? Is the point held consistently throughout the text, or did you get lost while reading at any point? If so, can you point out where reference to or reiteration of to the main point would have helped your reading experience?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"font-size: 14pt\">What information does the writer provide to support the central idea?<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt\"> Did you need more information to feel like the central idea was well supported? Do all paragraphs relate to the text\u2019s central idea?<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What kind of evidence does the writer use? <\/strong>Is it based more on fact or opinion? Can you clearly identify where this evidence come from? Are the sources authoritative and credible?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Is the writer working towards achieving the assignment&#8217;s purpose?<\/strong>\u00a0This is a question that is easiest to answer<i> <\/i>if you fully understand the assignment&#8217;s purpose. What are the goals of the assignment? What are the goals of this particular writer? Do those goals overlap?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Describe the tone in the draft.<\/strong> Is it friendly? Authoritative? Does it lecture? Is it biting or sarcastic? Does the author use simple language, or is it full of jargon? Does the language feel positive or negative? Now, consider the audience for this essay. Does the tone seem appropriate for that audience?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Using &#8220;I&#8221; statements to offer feedback on others&#8217; work<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Offer observations of assignment goals met\/not met<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>I see your thesis at the end of your intro paragraph<\/li>\n<li>I see transition phrases at the beginning of each new paragraph<\/li>\n<li>I can see that you ___________, \u00a0which is a goal of this paper<\/li>\n<li>In your ________ paragraph I see&#8230;.but I do not see&#8230;.<\/li>\n<li>I do not see a Works Cited<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Express your experience as a reader<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>My understanding is that the thesis of this paper should _______. I did not clearly see ______ in your thesis. Instead, I see (explain).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li>I was confused by this sentence (share the sentence) and I took it to mean (explain how you read that sentence).<\/li>\n<li>In paragraph ______ I thought that, based on what you said in the first sentence, the whole paragraph would discuss X. But it looks to me like at the end of the paragraph, you begin discussing Y, which felt to me like a new and different idea.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Express places where, as a reader, you were drawn in to the writing<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>I thought that the second paragraph was really clear and interesting because&#8230;.<\/li>\n<li>I like the way that you structured paragraph X because &#8230;.<\/li>\n<li>I appreciate your use of (signal phrases? citations? MLA format? transitions? etc) because I have been struggling with that in my own writing. Thanks for the example<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Phrases that can be ineffective<\/h2>\n<p>These types of phrases are telling the writer what to do and\/or simply offering judgment. They are &#8220;you&#8221; statements, not &#8220;I&#8221; statements.\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><strong>Try to avoid these types of peer assessment phrases:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> should fix<\/del><\/li>\n<li>The assignment says to ____<del>_ but <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">you<\/span> didn&#8217;t do that<\/del><\/li>\n<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> need more____<\/del><\/li>\n<li><del><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">You<\/span> need less_____<\/del><\/li>\n<li>To <del>make the paper better, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">you<\/span> need to____<\/del><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["emilie-zickel"],"pb_section_license":"cc-by-sa"},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[57],"license":[51],"class_list":["post-24","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-emilie-zickel","license-cc-by-sa"],"part":103,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/24","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/24\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1190,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/24\/revisions\/1190"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/103"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/24\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=24"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=24"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/csu-fyw-rhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=24"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}