{"id":84,"date":"2016-07-19T11:59:01","date_gmt":"2016-07-19T11:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/chapter\/what-is-sharia-law\/"},"modified":"2022-11-04T01:47:51","modified_gmt":"2022-11-04T01:47:51","slug":"what-is-sharia-law","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/chapter\/what-is-sharia-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 5. What is Shar\u2019ia Law?"},"content":{"raw":"Islamic law, or <em>shar\u2018ia<\/em>, is based on a set of sophisticated legal systems, and provides a basis for government as well as for personal life. The processes of developing <em>shar\u2018ia<\/em> are based on strict standards. Religious legal interpretation, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, encompasses nearly every permutation of social structure, area of human activity and aspect of government. \u00a0The <em>usul al-Fiqh<\/em> are the sources of Islamic legal interpretation. \u00a0These sources are used according the sequence below:\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>The Qur\u2019an<\/li>\r\n \t<li>The Traditions of the Prophet, <em>the Sunna,<\/em> his words (<em>Hadith<\/em>) and actions, or entirety of the traditions (<em>Sunna<\/em>)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Consensus of Juridical Scholars, or <em>Ijma\u02bf<\/em><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Analogy by Deduction, or <em>Qiyas<\/em><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Process of Setting New Precedents Based on the Above Sources, <em>Ijtihad<\/em><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nThere is a misconception that\u00a0<em>shar\u2018ia<\/em>\u00a0is taken directly from the Qur\u2019an without any process of interpretation, or application of legal precedents. The Qu\u2019ran is the most important source, and must be looked to first, but it is not the only source. Islamic jurisprudence, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, considers five main sources to be valid authorities. The first, and most authoritative is the Qur\u2019an, which is considered the word of God. The Qur\u2019an, however, did not address every particular aspect of daily life, but mainly gave principles to live by. Thus, accounts of the prophet (<em>hadith<\/em>) Muhammad\u2019s life and quotes of his words are the second most important source. In more complicated matters, the scholar can refer to the consensus of his peers. Jurist scholars then use analogies (<em>qiyasat<\/em>) when the exact case they are considering is not mentioned in these sources. For example, drugs like crack or heroin are not mentioned, but the prohibition on alcohol is issued due to its effect on the judgment and perception. This is a clear analogy the judge can use. Finally, if there is no precedent, he or she must engage in the intellectual struggle of <em>Ijtihad<\/em>. <em>Ijtihad<\/em> is based on the same root as <em>jihad<\/em> (which means to struggle - refer to \"<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/chapter\/islam-in-middle-eastern-societies\/#jihad\">The Concept of Jihad<\/a>\" for more details), indicating the level of effort required for identifying new paths for new circumstances that remain true to God\u2019s will.\r\n\r\nReligious legal interpretation, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, encompasses nearly every social structure, area of human activity and aspect of government. There is a massive body of law from which scholars of Islamic jurisprudence may draw upon. The Sunni schools of thought, or <em>mudhahib<\/em>, are: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi\u2018i, and Hanbali, while the primary Shi\u2018i school of thought is Ja\u2018afari. Among the Sunni schools of thought, Hanbali, is the one with the most focus on purifying Islam and adhering to the Qur\u2019an and the Sunna. This is the basis of Wahhabism and relates to the <em>salafi<\/em> movement that we explain more in subsequent sections. See <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/4\/44\/Madhhab_Map3.png\">Wikipedia's\u00a0map of <em>mudhahib<\/em> distribution<\/a> to understand what the countries of the Middle East and other Muslim-majority regions adhere to in regard to these schools of thought in Islamic legal interpretation.","rendered":"<p>Islamic law, or <em>shar\u2018ia<\/em>, is based on a set of sophisticated legal systems, and provides a basis for government as well as for personal life. The processes of developing <em>shar\u2018ia<\/em> are based on strict standards. Religious legal interpretation, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, encompasses nearly every permutation of social structure, area of human activity and aspect of government. \u00a0The <em>usul al-Fiqh<\/em> are the sources of Islamic legal interpretation. \u00a0These sources are used according the sequence below:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The Qur\u2019an<\/li>\n<li>The Traditions of the Prophet, <em>the Sunna,<\/em> his words (<em>Hadith<\/em>) and actions, or entirety of the traditions (<em>Sunna<\/em>)<\/li>\n<li>Consensus of Juridical Scholars, or <em>Ijma\u02bf<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Analogy by Deduction, or <em>Qiyas<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Process of Setting New Precedents Based on the Above Sources, <em>Ijtihad<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There is a misconception that\u00a0<em>shar\u2018ia<\/em>\u00a0is taken directly from the Qur\u2019an without any process of interpretation, or application of legal precedents. The Qu\u2019ran is the most important source, and must be looked to first, but it is not the only source. Islamic jurisprudence, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, considers five main sources to be valid authorities. The first, and most authoritative is the Qur\u2019an, which is considered the word of God. The Qur\u2019an, however, did not address every particular aspect of daily life, but mainly gave principles to live by. Thus, accounts of the prophet (<em>hadith<\/em>) Muhammad\u2019s life and quotes of his words are the second most important source. In more complicated matters, the scholar can refer to the consensus of his peers. Jurist scholars then use analogies (<em>qiyasat<\/em>) when the exact case they are considering is not mentioned in these sources. For example, drugs like crack or heroin are not mentioned, but the prohibition on alcohol is issued due to its effect on the judgment and perception. This is a clear analogy the judge can use. Finally, if there is no precedent, he or she must engage in the intellectual struggle of <em>Ijtihad<\/em>. <em>Ijtihad<\/em> is based on the same root as <em>jihad<\/em> (which means to struggle &#8211; refer to &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/chapter\/islam-in-middle-eastern-societies\/#jihad\">The Concept of Jihad<\/a>&#8221; for more details), indicating the level of effort required for identifying new paths for new circumstances that remain true to God\u2019s will.<\/p>\n<p>Religious legal interpretation, or <em>fiqh<\/em>, encompasses nearly every social structure, area of human activity and aspect of government. There is a massive body of law from which scholars of Islamic jurisprudence may draw upon. The Sunni schools of thought, or <em>mudhahib<\/em>, are: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi\u2018i, and Hanbali, while the primary Shi\u2018i school of thought is Ja\u2018afari. Among the Sunni schools of thought, Hanbali, is the one with the most focus on purifying Islam and adhering to the Qur\u2019an and the Sunna. This is the basis of Wahhabism and relates to the <em>salafi<\/em> movement that we explain more in subsequent sections. See <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/4\/44\/Madhhab_Map3.png\">Wikipedia&#8217;s\u00a0map of <em>mudhahib<\/em> distribution<\/a> to understand what the countries of the Middle East and other Muslim-majority regions adhere to in regard to these schools of thought in Islamic legal interpretation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"menu_order":5,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-84","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":57,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/84","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/84\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":418,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/84\/revisions\/418"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/57"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/84\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=84"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=84"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/religionsofmiddleeast1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=84"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}