{"id":222,"date":"2019-12-04T17:31:07","date_gmt":"2019-12-04T17:31:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/chapter\/ch-3-name-4\/"},"modified":"2020-11-13T20:07:49","modified_gmt":"2020-11-13T20:07:49","slug":"ch-3-name-4","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/chapter\/ch-3-name-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Ch. 5.3: Peer Groups as Social Context"},"content":{"raw":"A critical aspect of anyone\u2019s microsystem is encompassed by their peer relationships, particularly the friends with whom they interact on a regular and\/or relatively intimate basis. In this chapter, we review evidence concerning the power of the peer group both as risk and protective forces concerning individuals\u2019 substance use behavior. We also examine the important role peers potentially play in supporting a person\u2019s recovery from substance use disorders.\r\n

Peer Influences: Risk and Protection<\/strong><\/h2>\r\nLike the family, one\u2019s peer group provides a proximal context for learning (i.e., behavioral reinforcement and punishment) and social learning (observation, modeling) to operate, access to substances to occur, and social norms concerning substance-related behavior to be expressed and reinforced. \u201cEvidence has also demonstrated a robust relationship between peer substance use and personal substance use,\u201d particularly within best friendships, peer cliques, and social crowds (Zimmerman & Farrell, 2017, p. 229). Equally important is evidence that positive peer influences, particularly among close friends, predicts low substance use among adolescents\u2014potentially serving as a protective factor (Coyle et al., 2016).\r\n\r\nPeer relationship influences on substance use (among adolescents, at least) are not independent of parental\/family influences. The peer group may reinforce family norms against substance use\/misuse, serving as a protective factor, or the peer group may contradict those family norms, serving as a risk factor. One mechanism by which low-level parental monitoring may operate to increase the probability of substance use\/misuse among youth is the greater opportunity to engage with friends or other peers whose influence supports substance use\/misuse (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>). On the flip side, parental monitoring has the effect of weakening the influence of associating with peers who engage in substance use\/misuse (Marschall-Levesque, Castellanos-Ryan, Vitaro, & Seguin, 2014).\r\n\r\nClearly, peer approval and modeling of substance use\/misuse is a powerful risk factor for adolescent substance use\/misuse (Zimmerman & Farrell, 2017). Adolescents\u2019 initiation of substance use, as well as its escalation into problematic substance misuse, \u00a0is strongly associated with friends\u2019 and peers\u2019 substance use (Vink, 2016). This is evident with tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana; it possibly holds true with other substances, as well (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>). However, peer influences encountered during adolescence may persist well into emerging adulthood, at least as far as active involvement with friends who use alcohol is concerned (Piehler, V\u00e9ronneau, & Dishion, 2012). In keeping with the previously noted human tendency toward homophily, about half of all people identified as important in the social networks described by individuals entering into treatment for alcohol use disorder were characterized as \u201cdrinkers\u201d (24.63%), as were 19% of the most important people in their social networks (Mohr et al., 2001). Conversely, 9 months later, following 3 months of treatment, the rate of \u201cdrinkers\u201d had declined significantly (17.98% among important people and 14.81% among the most important) and the rate of \u201cnondrinking friends\u201d had increased significantly from 17.98% to 33.37% of all the important people and from 14.81% to 21.47% among the most important people. Furthermore, the social network constellation of \u201cdrinking\u201d and \u201cnondrinking\u201d friends was significantly related to treatment outcomes: the more important \u201cnondrinking\u201d friends became, the greater the individuals\u2019 proportion of abstinent days themselves (Mohr et al., 2001).\r\n

Peer Support<\/strong><\/h2>\r\nAs noted, the support of friends and peers as SSOs are important in a person\u2019s efforts at quitting substance use (Mohr et al., 2001). In the realm of recovery support, the word \u201cpeer\u201d has multiple meanings. It may no longer imply persons of the same age\/developmental life stage. Instead, it may take on the meaning of individuals with similar lived experiences in common. In this light, peer support is concerned with assisting others who may be at risk of developing substance use disorder to avoid this outcome or assisting others engaged in recovery to succeed in their efforts (Paquette et al., 2019). Peers are instrumental in assisting in recovery and integral part of recovery programming for adolescents, college students, and adults (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>; Davidson et al., 2012; Laudet et al., 2014; Paquette et al., 2019). For example, this is an important element of sober schools and sober campus housing programs, as well as mutual aid\/recovery support programs. A systematic review of evidence concerning peer-delivered recovery support services concluded that the outcomes were favorable and made positive contributions to the participants\u2019 outcomes (Bassuk et al., 2016):\r\n\r\nWhile we can conclude that there is evidence for the effectiveness of peer-delivered recovery support services, additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of different approaches and types of peer support services, with regard to the amount, intensity, skill level of the peer, service context, and effectiveness among different target populations\u201d (p. 7).","rendered":"

A critical aspect of anyone\u2019s microsystem is encompassed by their peer relationships, particularly the friends with whom they interact on a regular and\/or relatively intimate basis. In this chapter, we review evidence concerning the power of the peer group both as risk and protective forces concerning individuals\u2019 substance use behavior. We also examine the important role peers potentially play in supporting a person\u2019s recovery from substance use disorders.<\/p>\n

Peer Influences: Risk and Protection<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Like the family, one\u2019s peer group provides a proximal context for learning (i.e., behavioral reinforcement and punishment) and social learning (observation, modeling) to operate, access to substances to occur, and social norms concerning substance-related behavior to be expressed and reinforced. \u201cEvidence has also demonstrated a robust relationship between peer substance use and personal substance use,\u201d particularly within best friendships, peer cliques, and social crowds (Zimmerman & Farrell, 2017, p. 229). Equally important is evidence that positive peer influences, particularly among close friends, predicts low substance use among adolescents\u2014potentially serving as a protective factor (Coyle et al., 2016).<\/p>\n

Peer relationship influences on substance use (among adolescents, at least) are not independent of parental\/family influences. The peer group may reinforce family norms against substance use\/misuse, serving as a protective factor, or the peer group may contradict those family norms, serving as a risk factor. One mechanism by which low-level parental monitoring may operate to increase the probability of substance use\/misuse among youth is the greater opportunity to engage with friends or other peers whose influence supports substance use\/misuse (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>). On the flip side, parental monitoring has the effect of weakening the influence of associating with peers who engage in substance use\/misuse (Marschall-Levesque, Castellanos-Ryan, Vitaro, & Seguin, 2014).<\/p>\n

Clearly, peer approval and modeling of substance use\/misuse is a powerful risk factor for adolescent substance use\/misuse (Zimmerman & Farrell, 2017). Adolescents\u2019 initiation of substance use, as well as its escalation into problematic substance misuse, \u00a0is strongly associated with friends\u2019 and peers\u2019 substance use (Vink, 2016). This is evident with tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana; it possibly holds true with other substances, as well (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>). However, peer influences encountered during adolescence may persist well into emerging adulthood, at least as far as active involvement with friends who use alcohol is concerned (Piehler, V\u00e9ronneau, & Dishion, 2012). In keeping with the previously noted human tendency toward homophily, about half of all people identified as important in the social networks described by individuals entering into treatment for alcohol use disorder were characterized as \u201cdrinkers\u201d (24.63%), as were 19% of the most important people in their social networks (Mohr et al., 2001). Conversely, 9 months later, following 3 months of treatment, the rate of \u201cdrinkers\u201d had declined significantly (17.98% among important people and 14.81% among the most important) and the rate of \u201cnondrinking friends\u201d had increased significantly from 17.98% to 33.37% of all the important people and from 14.81% to 21.47% among the most important people. Furthermore, the social network constellation of \u201cdrinking\u201d and \u201cnondrinking\u201d friends was significantly related to treatment outcomes: the more important \u201cnondrinking\u201d friends became, the greater the individuals\u2019 proportion of abstinent days themselves (Mohr et al., 2001).<\/p>\n

Peer Support<\/strong><\/h2>\n

As noted, the support of friends and peers as SSOs are important in a person\u2019s efforts at quitting substance use (Mohr et al., 2001). In the realm of recovery support, the word \u201cpeer\u201d has multiple meanings. It may no longer imply persons of the same age\/developmental life stage. Instead, it may take on the meaning of individuals with similar lived experiences in common. In this light, peer support is concerned with assisting others who may be at risk of developing substance use disorder to avoid this outcome or assisting others engaged in recovery to succeed in their efforts (Paquette et al., 2019). Peers are instrumental in assisting in recovery and integral part of recovery programming for adolescents, college students, and adults (Begun, Bares, & Chartier, in press<\/em>; Davidson et al., 2012; Laudet et al., 2014; Paquette et al., 2019). For example, this is an important element of sober schools and sober campus housing programs, as well as mutual aid\/recovery support programs. A systematic review of evidence concerning peer-delivered recovery support services concluded that the outcomes were favorable and made positive contributions to the participants\u2019 outcomes (Bassuk et al., 2016):<\/p>\n

While we can conclude that there is evidence for the effectiveness of peer-delivered recovery support services, additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of different approaches and types of peer support services, with regard to the amount, intensity, skill level of the peer, service context, and effectiveness among different target populations\u201d (p. 7).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"menu_order":3,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[48],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-222","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless"],"part":188,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":885,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/222\/revisions\/885"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/188"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/222\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=222"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=222"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu\/substancemisusepart1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}