Added in August 2023.

Exercise 1:

Case Study: BridgeTech Inc. Expanded

BridgeTech Inc. is a fictional civil engineering company that has been in operation for over two decades. With a portfolio spanning various geographies, the firm has earned accolades for its innovative designs and sustainable construction practices. In their latest venture, the company plans to erect a state-of-the-art bridge over the bustling River Delta.

The proposed bridge is a blend of aesthetic beauty and functional brilliance. Envisioned with pedestrian walkways, dedicated cycling paths, and viewpoints, the bridge promises to offer breathtaking views of the city skyline. It is not merely a transportation project but is seen as a potential boost to the city’s tourism, envisaged to become a hotspot for both locals and tourists.

The River Delta, however, presents a challenging terrain. It’s a major route for commercial shipping, with large vessels passing through daily. Any construction activity could disrupt this flow, leading to potential economic ramifications. Additionally, the riverbanks are dotted with residential zones, including luxury condos and heritage homes, many of which have been there for generations. Residents cherish their tranquil river views and are concerned about the mammoth construction that’s about to unfold.

From an environmental perspective, the River Delta is rich in biodiversity. Home to several endangered fish species and a unique mangrove ecosystem, any construction activity could pose a threat to this delicate balance. Local environmental groups have been vocal in their concerns, seeking assurance that the project won’t lead to ecological degradation.

The local government is in a tight spot. While they see the long-term benefits of the bridge, they also have to ensure the concerns of residents, businesses, and environmentalists are adequately addressed. They’ve given a conditional nod to the project, emphasizing minimal disruption and adherence to the highest environmental standards.

Questions:

1. Given the multifaceted challenges of the project, who are the primary external stakeholders that BridgeTech Inc. needs to engage with continuously?
2. If the project scope expands due to incorporating environmental safeguards, how might this affect the project’s overall budget and timeline, considering the triple constraints?
3. With residents worried about both the construction phase and the eventual impact on their serene views, how can BridgeTech Inc. strike a balance between project requirements and maintaining the aesthetic appeal of the riverfront?
4. Shipping activities are vital for the city’s economy. What mitigation strategies can BridgeTech implement to ensure minimal disruption to commercial shipping routes during construction?
5. If prominent environmental groups launch a campaign leading to a temporary halt in the project, how can BridgeTech realign its strategies and resources to accommodate such unforeseen delays and get back on track?

Exercise 2:

Case Study: SunVille Solar Park Project

EcoPower Inc. is a fictional energy company that specializes in renewable energy projects. The company has recently acquired a vast stretch of land in SunVille, a small town known for its sunny weather throughout the year. EcoPower’s ambitious project aims to transform this land into one of the region’s most extensive solar parks, which could potentially power the entire SunVille town and its neighboring areas.

The SunVille Solar Park promises significant environmental benefits by reducing the region’s reliance on fossil fuels. However, the project’s scale means that a large portion of the acquired land, currently used for agriculture, will have to be repurposed. This transition will undoubtedly impact the local community, which primarily depends on farming.

While the local government is generally supportive of renewable energy initiatives, they’re also concerned about the potential job losses in the agricultural sector and the change in the town’s rural character. At the same time, environmentalists, although supportive of green energy, worry about the local flora and fauna being affected by such a large-scale installation.

EcoPower’s investors are enthusiastic about the project’s potential returns, given the increasing global emphasis on clean energy. However, they also emphasize the importance of smooth execution without significant delays, as such setbacks could affect projected returns.

Local businesses, especially those in the hospitality sector, see an opportunity. They believe that the solar park, if designed innovatively, could attract eco-tourists, leading to increased business.

Residents are divided. While some are excited about SunVille potentially becoming a landmark for clean energy, others, especially farmers, are anxious about their future.

To navigate this complex scenario, EcoPower decides to create a Stakeholder Power/Interest Grid. They identify the following stakeholders:

1. Local Government
2. Environmentalists
3. Investors
4. Local Businesses (Hospitality Sector)
5. Residents
6. Farmers
7. Eco-tourists
8. Company Employees

Questions:

1. Using the provided information, plot each stakeholder on the Power/Interest Grid.
2. Which stakeholders should EcoPower closely manage and engage with regularly based on their position in the grid?
3. How can EcoPower address the concerns of stakeholders with high interest but varying levels of power?
4. Considering the potential positive and negative impacts of the project, how should EcoPower prioritize its communication and engagement activities?
5. How might the Power/Interest Grid evolve as the project progresses, and how should EcoPower adapt its stakeholder management strategies accordingly?